Pular para o conteúdo principal

GraphDB Fundamentals - OntoText

GraphDB Fundamentals - Module 1: Overview of RDF & RDFS

Link -> https://graphdb.ontotext.com/free/devhub/rdfs.html 

RDF Schema, more commonly known as RDFS, adds schema to the RDF. It defines a metamodel of concepts like Resource, Literal, Class, and Datatype and relationships such as subClassOf, subPropertyOf, domain, and range. RDFS provides a means for defining the classes, properties, and relationships in an RDF model and organizing these concepts and relationships into hierarchies.

RDFS specifies entailment rules or axioms for the concepts and relationships. These rules can be used to infer new triples.

Link -> https://graphdb.ontotext.com/free/devhub/sparql.html

GraphDB Fundamentals - Module 3: Ontology

Link -> https://graphdb.ontotext.com/free/devhub/ontologies.html

What is in an Ontology? Concepts and properties in a domain, Relationships  between concepts, Constraints on how the relationships can be used and Individuals as members of concepts

Why develop an ontology? A common undertanting of information, explicit domain assumptions, su pport data integration for analytics, apply domain knowledge to data, support interoperation of applications, enable model-driven applications, reduce the time and cost of application developement, improve data quality (metadata and provenance)

OWL / RDF / RDFS

    Consistency checks:Are there logical inconsistencies?
    Satisfiability checks: Are there classes that cannot have instances?
    Classification: What is the type of an instance?
    Identities:  sameAs, differentFrom, equivalentClass, equivalentProperty
    Class definitions: intersection, union, complement, disjointness
    Cardinality restrictions
    Properties definitions: object and datatypes, transitive, functional, symmetric, inverse propeties, value restrictions

Inference

Link -> https://graphdb.ontotext.com/free/devhub/inference.html

Inference is the derivation of new knowledge from existing knowledge and axioms.Facts change all the time and the amount of resources it would take to manually manage updates or rerun the inferencing process would be overwhelming without this capability. Users realize improved query speed, data availability and accurate analysis.

GraphDB supports inference out of the box and provides updates to inferred facts automatically. The system can be configured via “rule-sets” – sets of axiomatic triples and entailment rules – that determine the applied semantics. We provide full standard-compliant reasoning for RDFS, OWL-Horst, OWL2-RL and OWL2-QL as well as support for custom reasoning and performance optimized rule-sets via .pie files.

Inference is important as it uncovers the full power of data modelled with RDF(S) and ontologies. GraphDB will use existing data and the rules to infer more facts and thus produce an richer data set than the one you started with. Inference is one of the main advantages over relational databases.

Programming

From the technical perspective, GraphDB is built on top of the RDF4J, a powerful Java framework for processing and handling RDF data. This includes creating, parsing, storing, inferencing and querying over such data.

Link -> https://graphdb.ontotext.com/free/devhub/programming.html

Typically, GraphDB is used as a standalone server running as a Tomcat application. Clients then connect to that server over HTTP to execute queries and modify the data.

It is also possible to run GraphDB as an embedded database and use the RDF4J API directly on it, thus bypassing the need for a separate server or even networking. This is typically used to implement testing or simpler applications.

From Disparate Data to Visualized Knowledge

Link -> https://youtu.be/jzXdt3V64fQ

OntoRefine (inspirado no OpenRefine): xml, json, csv, tsv, ... 

rdf:sameAs para correlacionar objetos iguais, por exemplo, se uma organização X está localizada no endereço Y e uma organização Z está localizada no endereço Y então X rdf:sameAs Z (inferência)

SHACL para validação, verificar a qualidade do dado de modo iterativo, W3C,

Ingestão de dados e automatização do processo de validação, ETL com GraphDB API

Federação com SPARQL: interna (entre repositórios GraphDB) e externa (com EndPoints)

Ontop Virtual Repository: RDF 2 SQL

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

Connected Papers: Uma abordagem alternativa para revisão da literatura

Durante um projeto de pesquisa podemos encontrar um artigo que nos identificamos em termos de problema de pesquisa e também de solução. Então surge a vontade de saber como essa área de pesquisa se desenvolveu até chegar a esse ponto ou quais desdobramentos ocorreram a partir dessa solução proposta para identificar o estado da arte nesse tema. Podemos seguir duas abordagens:  realizar uma revisão sistemática usando palavras chaves que melhor caracterizam o tema em bibliotecas digitais de referência para encontrar artigos relacionados ou realizar snowballing ancorado nesse artigo que identificamos previamente, explorando os artigos citados (backward) ou os artigos que o citam (forward)  Mas a ferramenta Connected Papers propõe uma abordagem alternativa para essa busca. O problema inicial é dado um artigo de interesse, precisamos encontrar outros artigos relacionados de "certa forma". Find different methods and approaches to the same subject Track down the state of the art rese...

Knowledge Graph Embedding with Triple Context - Leitura de Abstract

  Jun Shi, Huan Gao, Guilin Qi, and Zhangquan Zhou. 2017. Knowledge Graph Embedding with Triple Context. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2299–2302. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3133119 ABSTRACT Knowledge graph embedding, which aims to represent entities and relations in vector spaces, has shown outstanding performance on a few knowledge graph completion tasks. Most existing methods are based on the assumption that a knowledge graph is a set of separate triples, ignoring rich graph features, i.e., structural information in the graph. In this paper, we take advantages of structures in knowledge graphs, especially local structures around a triple, which we refer to as triple context. We then propose a Triple-Context-based knowledge Embedding model (TCE). For each triple, two kinds of structure information are considered as its context in the graph; one is the out...

KnOD 2021

Beyond Facts: Online Discourse and Knowledge Graphs A preface to the proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Knowledge Graphs for Online Discourse Analysis (KnOD 2021, co-located with TheWebConf’21) https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2877/preface.pdf https://knod2021.wordpress.com/   ABSTRACT Expressing opinions and interacting with others on the Web has led to the production of an abundance of online discourse data, such as claims and viewpoints on controversial topics, their sources and contexts . This data constitutes a valuable source of insights for studies into misinformation spread, bias reinforcement, echo chambers or political agenda setting. While knowledge graphs promise to provide the key to a Web of structured information, they are mainly focused on facts without keeping track of the diversity, connection or temporal evolution of online discourse data. As opposed to facts, claims are inherently more complex. Their interpretation strongly depends on the context and a vari...